All Issue

2020 Vol.10, Issue 3

Research Article

Studying the Impact of Personality Traits on Team Performance for Construction and Engineering
Payne Arlys S. 1
,
Harper Christofer M. 2*
1Ph.D. Candidate, Bert S. Turner Department of Construction Management, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
2Assistant Professor, Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
*Corresponding Author
31 December 2020. pp. 1-24
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

There has been an increased interest in personality traits and its impact on team performance. The construction industry can benefit from such studies to predict the team performance in construction projects. Since team performance is an important factor for project success in the construction industry, there is the need to determine the mean correlation value of the Big Five Factors (BFF) of personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience) that assist with predicting construction project team performance based on the personalities of team members. The research methodology for this paper comprises a meta-analysis of existing team performance studies that focus on personality traits linked to team performance, teambuilding, team efficiency, teamwork, job performance, and collaboration for construction project teams. The findings, from the 33 studies used in the meta-analysis, show that conscientiousness has the highest correlation mean and neuroticism has the lowest correlation mean for team performance, while extraversion and agreeableness do not share a common correlation mean, making these traits heterogeneous. Conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience share a common correlation mean, making these traits homogeneous. Overall, the results of the study show that personality traits do influence team performance, and that a mean correlation value can be determined from published studies. However, it also confirms that further research is needed on this topic as it relates to the construction industry.

Keywords
Team building
Team Performance
Personality Traits
Meta-Analysis
References
1
Wang, J., and Zhang, J., A win-win team formation problem based on the negotiation, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 44, pp. 137-152, 2015. 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.06.001
2
Goldberg, L. R., The structure of phenotypic personality traits, The American Psychologist, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 26-34, 1993. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
3
Jackson, J.J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K.E., Harms, P.D., Roberts, B.W., What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC), Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 44, no. 4., pp. 501-511., 2010 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.06.00521278818PMC3028204
4
Albanese, R., Team-building process: Key to better project results, Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 36-44, 1994. 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:6(36)
5
O'Neill, T. A., and Allen, N. J., Personality and the prediction of team performance, European Journal of Personality, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31-42, 2010. 10.1002/per.769
6
Sarason, I. G., and Holzman, P. S., Personality assessment, Encyclopaedia Britannica, pp. 1-17, 1999. [Accessed March 3, 2019]. https://www.britannica.com/science/personality-assessment
7
Carlson, R., Where is the person in personality research? ETS Research Bulletin Series, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 203-219, 1971. 10.1037/h00304695547373
8
Gibby, R. E., and Zickar, M. J., A history of the early days of personality testing in American industry: An obsession with adjustment, History of Psychology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 164-184, 2008. 10.1037/a001304119048975
9
Soldz, S., and Vaillant, G. E., The Big Five Personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study, Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 208-232, 1999. 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243
10
Quintana, D. S.,. From pre-registration to publication: a non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, pp. 1549, 2015. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0154926500598PMC4597034
11
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., & Rothstein, H.R. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2009. 10.1002/9780470743386
12
Cooper, H., Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach, Applied Social Research Methods, Fifth Edition. Sage Publications, Inc, 2016.
13
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement, BMJ, vol. 339, pp. b2535-b2535, 2009. 10.1136/bmj.b253519622551PMC2714657
14
Ellis, P. D., The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results, Cambridge University Press, 2010. 10.1017/CBO9780511761676
15
Bell, S. T., Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 595-615, 2007. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.59517484544
16
R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna: The R Foundation and Environment for Statistical Computing, 2017. [Accessed April 20, 2019]. https://www.r-project. org/about.html
17
Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the Metafor Package, Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1-48, 2010. 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
18
Fisher, Z., and Tipton, E., Robumeta: Robust variance meta-regression, R Package Version 1.6. CRAN, 2015.
19
Del Re, A. C. A Practical Tutorial on Conducting Meta-Analysis in R, Journal of The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 37-50, 2015. 10.20982/tqmp.11.1.p037
20
Theofilatos, A., Ziakopoulos, A., Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G., and Diamandouros, K., Meta-analysis of the effect of roadwork zones on crash occurrence, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 108, pp. 1-8, 2017. 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.02428837836
21
Bradley, B. H., Klotz, A. C., Postlethwaite, B. E., and Brown, K. G., Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 385-392, 2012. 10.1037/a002984522963513
22
Juhász, M., Influence of personality on teamwork behavior and communication, Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 63-77, 2010. 10.3311/pp.so.2010-2.02
Information
  • Publisher :Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국건설관리학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
  • Volume : 10
  • No :3
  • Pages :1-24
  • Received Date :2020. 03. 03
  • Revised Date :2020. 10. 06
  • Accepted Date : 2020. 12. 31
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2020.10.3-4.001
Journal Informaiton Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close